The cons are that the supplied instruments are pretty MEH and the workflow can be a little clunky. Those are the reasons I use it rather than Reason. Other stuff I use a lot: diatonic transposition, midi event view, controller data thinning, midi loop recording. If you are a geek, Cakewalk still supports the CAL macro language which is a very fast way to adjust/filter notes, velocities, whatever. Reason does not do MIDI VSTs or VST3.Ĭakewalk has a half decent music staff view which helps if you need to collaborate with a "real musician". Yes, it Rewires just fine, but Reason has to be the Rewire slave and you can't use VSTs in Reason when Rewired (PH - why not?)Ĭakewalk is much, much better than Reason for MIDI sequencing and has better VST support. I also dabble with Reaper, Bitwig and Ableton but I always come back to Cakewalk when I need to get stuff done. I've used Cakewalk since the days of MSDOS and I still use it for probably 25% of my music time, Reason being the other 75%.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |